The two charts illustrate the prospect of undergraduates and masters from Britain who is not working with a full-time job in the year 2008.
it can be clearly seen that most of the graduates are pursuing further study. Overall, both of them are not interested in voluntary work.
For the undergraduates, the proportion of further study was highest, almost 30000 persons wanted. The second high was part-time work, there were 17735 undergraduates. The situation of unemployment was serious for undergraduates, more than 15000 students were taken it. the number of voluntary work was low, only 3500 undergraduates participated with this hobby.
On the other hand, the distance between further study and part-time work was narrowed, there were 2725 and 2535 respectively. the proportion of unemployment was the same as the undergraduates as far as the masters, the number of this destination was 1625. Lastly, a few of them were interested in volunteering also, which got 345 only.
- The plan below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Some People think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 73
- The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...with a full-time job in the year 2008. it can be clearly seen that most of the gr...
^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... there were 2725 and 2535 respectively. the proportion of unemployment was the same...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, lastly, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 41.998997996 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 1615.20841683 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 157.0 315.596192385 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25477707006 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 4.20363070211 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1889907581 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 176.041082164 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624203821656 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 506.74238477 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7301379709 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0914243052643 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390362493582 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440545019152 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692217491048 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508237471628 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 78.4519038076 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.