Nowadays social life and community interactions are rare among urban residents. Two main reasons, threatening of privacy and lack of public space, have caused such phenomena and it is within the government’s capability and responsibility to address these issues.
Residential areas in city are dense and crowded in population. It is hard to have decent privacy in their living, especially for those living in high-rise apartments. Because living too close in one unit, people can easily know what their neighbours are doing no matter they want to know or not. So many people are avoiding social events that would meet their neighbours. Thus no social life would emerge in a community without people’s willingness to have one. Moreover, in urban regions, the public space and facilities are always scarce for residents to carry out activities and meet each other. Those ones that would like to organize events in their neighbourhood or establish a community group usually find it difficult to have a venue for it. This adds more difficulties for a community to nourish its culture and unity.
To solve the density problem, the government can build more homes in areas that are in suburban area where the land is larger. This would allow some population from city centre live in the outskirt of the city, in order to decrease the population density in city areas. With more space for each household, urban habitats would feel less threatened from privacy so that they can relax and enjoy the social life in their community. As for the lack of public space, the government can set regulations to developers that the new built projects should be designed with enough space for public usages and facilities. Therefore, it will make possible for future dwellers to interact with locals and create a sense of community.
To conclude, the lost of social life in communities is a problem due to high density of habitats in city centre areas. The authorities should solve such problem by lowering the density and give more space for public use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...vents that would meet their neighbours. Thus no social life would emerge in a commun...
^^^^
Line 2, column 599, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'Those' instead.
Suggestion: Those
...rry out activities and meet each other. Those ones that would like to organize events in t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01176470588 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66786593563 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532352941176 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4857542448 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.235294118 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76470588235 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19331504036 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653052378677 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444254561853 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118546959846 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467167872015 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.