The computer is widely used in education and some people think teachers do not play an important role in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

computers are inferred from the immense advances in technology which has a ripple effect in most aspects of people's lives, in particular in the field of education. This interpretation can provide us with insights into diminishing the role of teachers in the classroom. I, however, disagree with the given assertion on the basis of compelling reasons.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that teachers would employ an identical method to teach students who have different intellectual capacities. In this case, full-fledged students would be tied to slow advances in the way of learning because of others' incapacity of understanding. pupils can take simultaneously advantages by using computers and teachers' learning process. to put it differently, these students can progress in their acquisition of knowledge at their own pace when compared with other classmates.
In addition to this, another root reason is that the presence of the teacher is essential for students owing to influences them in a positive way and the benefit accruing are by no means negligible. That is, human interaction has a powerful impact on learning level for students. School-children realize that they do not contact with a machine but a human who deserves to respect and attention. Along with this, teachers can evaluate the students by requiring the examination which helps students do not fail in any subject because of giving extra explanation, extra training or even suggesting private tutor. This tendency, hence, would manage the chance of student to be on the rise to succeed in all school purposes.
To conclude, the role of teachers remain still extremely important and will continue to be effective in schools on the basis of fundamental of human correlation and exploit the computers to improve students’ ability.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Computers
computers are inferred from the immense advances ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Pupils
... of others incapacity of understanding. pupils can take simultaneously advantages by u...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 379, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...y using computers and teachers learning process. to put it differently, these students ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...omputers and teachers learning process. to put it differently, these students can ...
^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...l for students owing to influences them in a positive way and the benefit accruing are by no mean...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, still, in addition, in particular, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32871972318 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07844930663 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602076124567 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9655545438 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.461538462 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137463666865 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478670095055 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400018829696 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870930925224 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230334684992 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.