Many people claim that nations with average working hours are prosperous in economy than those countries with average office hours. I fully disagree with this statement because excessive working time can lead to negative impacts on employee's health and social life.
To begin with, prolonging the duration of working hours may not improve the productivity of employees. To be more specific, extended working hours can push employee's health in illness and fatigue since employees do not have time for exercising and relaxing. An unhealthy lifestyle could increase the risk of heart disease, diabetes and stress. As a result, working excessively may decline labor performance. According to a recent research, extending office hours adversely contribute to health problems, which impact directly on decreased productivity.
Another point to consider that employee's social life affected by working overtime. In more detail, people may find it hard to socialize and spend time on entertainment. Because of long work hours, some employees difficultly maintain their relationship and their family. A recent study shows that 70% of Japanese adults tend to remain single, which affect negatively to low birthrate in Japan, due to excessive working. Consequently, birthrates are likely to fall, which leaves a society with an aging population and influences harmful economy.
In conclusion, this essay affirms that extended office hours in some countries is not affluent economically than countries, where do not have a long work hours. Excessive work hours may not only impact detrimentally on employee's performance but also affect employees' social life.
- An increasing number of people do not know their neighbors and there is no longer a sense of community What do you think are the causes of this situation Can you suggest some solutions 73
- There has been a dramatic growth in the number of people studying at universities in the last few decades While some people see this as a positive trend which raises the general level of education within the community others fear that it is lowering the q 56
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 89
- The maps below show a book store in 2000 and now Summarise the main information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 73
- Many children today find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What could you think are the main causes What are the possible solutions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ng time can lead to negative impacts on employees health and social life. To begin wit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'hour'?
Suggestion: hour
...ountries, where do not have a long work hours. Excessive work hours may not only impa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...rs may not only impact detrimentally on employees performance but also affect employees s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8490026325 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4074993906 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.357142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312459472187 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100315026772 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817916859724 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201422476285 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548002449571 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.