One of the most severe issues that the majortiy of nations face is ecological degradation. It is attributed to two key circumstances relating to human activities including industrialization and deforestation for intensive land use; therefore, both manufacturing companies and individuals have to be accountable for environmental conservation.
There are two principal factors that inflict environmental degradation. The main one is the industrial waste discharged from manufacturing. More specifically, chemical effluents, which are by-products of industries, are discharged into bodies of water without having undergone proper treatment methods, causing water pollution and subsequently harm to aquatic life. Another influence is deforestation for other land uses such as agriculture and infrastructure. Fauna and floral species are cleared to make room for cropland and accommodation to cater to the increasing food and housing needs triggered by the rising population. As a result, there is a massive loss of vegetative cover and trees, leading to ecological imbalance.
Therefore, both industrial firms and individuals should be accountable for preserving the environment for the damage they caused to it, but only governments can solve it effectively. First and foremost, they can impose stricter legislation to deter factories from releasing chemical waste into the environment. For example, the Vietnamese government enacted a decree on industrial waste control under the Environmental Protection Law 2020, successfully reducing the amount of toxic waste from industrial plants and significantly ameliorating the water quality of rivers. Furthermore, laws against deforestation can be introduced by states to avoid detrimental impacts on the natural habitats of animals and plants. To be more specific, it should be made compulsory for residents to farm and erect their houses in certain areas which are far removed from wildlife. This can be implemented by introducing punishments such as the enforcement of land recovery and monetary fines for those who break the laws.
In conclusion, environmental deterioration is ascribed to industrial processes and deforestation; thus, industrial companies and individuals should be responsible for environmental damage. However, viable measures must be taken by governments such as the enactment of legislation for industrial safety and land use to tackle it successfully. It is advisable that the governments of different nations should make a collective effort to tackle ecological harm more effectively.
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the most important sources of news Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement 73
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Environmental damage is the problem of most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper books Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this trend 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs triggered" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'triggering' or 'to be triggered'.
Suggestion: triggering; to be triggered
...o the increasing food and housing needs triggered by the rising population. As a result, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...islation for industrial safety and land use to tackle it successfully. It is advisa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93243243243 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4964460721 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2350479936 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.117647059 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108761102289 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356249115947 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443988647143 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0632066789658 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025601970797 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.