Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that we live in a world where technology plays vital role to resolve difficulties. Scientists have been developing advanced technology so that people can get rid of environmental issues such as pollution, global warming, green house effect etc. Some scholars opine that environment has already been damaged significantly that no technology can restore at its previous level, while others think that implementing advanced machines can be one of the major solutions of reducing and eliminating environmental problems. However, I firmly disagree with the statement and think that environmental problems are unstoppable because of rapidly growing population and shrinking the expansion opportunities.
On one hand, environmental issues will continue because of growing number of population around the globe. First, the population has been increasing so fast that advanced technology won't be able to reduce the damage significantly, because people will continuously destroy the resources of habitats. Additionally, the more people grow the more will be the demand of water, places, food etc, resulting to non-stop consumption of these sources. It is illustrated that almost 80%of the trees are cut off in city areas of Bangladesh that results the rise of temperatures. Hence, it is worth mentioning that technology will not be the solution against the rapidly raising population and environmental deterioration.
On the other hand, shrinkage of expansion opportunities compound the environmental problems threefold. Firstly, lands for dumping the wastage are limited because most of the lands are currently using for living, agricultural or construction purposes. Secondly, alternative sources that generate lower amount of harmful emissions are comparably limited. For instance, developing country like Ghana is using almost 100000 brick construction companies to make bricks, resulting air pollution in the country. Moreover, technology has not become developed enough that products can be recycled once used. Hence, technology will not probably the significant solution to eradicate environmental problems.
To conclude, it is often argued whether developing technology can remove the environmental problems such as pollution, harmful emissions, warming etc or not. However, I think that technology will be unable to restore the environment as population will grow rapidly and expansion opportunities will shrink in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-27 | JAY9923 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | JAY9923 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | JAY9923 | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | join2saurav | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-17 | join2saurav | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people's behavior. What is your opinion? 61
- Social media has many positive uses, but there have been some negative consequences to it as well. Identify a problem caused by social media and describe the solutions you would propose to address this problem. 89
- Friendships can be very meaningful and special but also very complicated What are the qualities of a great friend What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time 73
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- Some schools put the most advanced students in separate classes from their peers so they can study more challenging materials Do the advantages of this practice outweigh the disadvantages 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ural or construction purposes. Secondly, alternative sources that generate lower ...
^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...and expansion opportunities will shrink in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i think, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85994397759 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19454739104 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560224089636 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5391086179 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.058823529 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180220970744 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627583827024 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425591691687 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119723250737 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224265797984 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.