Some people subscribe to the view that speaking fewer languages, as well as lingua franca, would be more plausible and highly efficient for a sustainable life. However, I personally do not entirely accept this, and I will discuss why in this essay.
Firstly, if the mother languages and local dialects were on the verge of extinction, local dwellers would have to contend with the major issue of cultural identity. No matter how widely-used an alternative language is, the cultural traditions and mythologies, which are handed down between generations, will be inevitably replaced by alien contexts and stereotypes. This is perhaps tremendously influential because can affect the fabric of society and social standards. A further widely-observed impact might be that a wealth of information and knowledge, written exclusively in a local language, could be progressively overlooked. This is simply problematic since a considerable number of literary and scientific resources will be eventually anonymous for new generations. For instance, some valuable medical literatures which were written by Avicenna, an internationally well-known scientist, has not been intelligible for the contemporary students, particularly in Iran.
On the other hand, it is true that an universal language as a lingua franca may be of great benefits to mutual understanding between those from a diverse cultural and geographical backgrounds. Nevertheless, it seems that for many older inhabitants these pleasures are weighted down by issues which can cause social isolation and psychologic disadvantages.
All things considered, it seems sensible to elucidate that if local languages were not effectively conserved, the cultural context and heritage, and historic literatures would be threatened with extinction, gradually making a remarkable change in the area of social norms.
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects shouldn't worry about producing building as a work of art. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 84
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 95
- It’s good to have English as a global language. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your reasons and include relevant examples from your own experience. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
.... On the other hand, it is true that an universal language as a lingua franca m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75362318841 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33123752639 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641304347826 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5858510814 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.363636364 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149138264821 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057429303126 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376038052912 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092660121558 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600044774362 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.