In recent years, learning a new language is common around the world. Some people believe that life will be easier when there are fewer languages globally while others think this is crucial to have several languages in the world. This essay will discuss why fewer languages will affect in positive ways in the future.
If there are not more languages in the world, communication will get easily in any part of the world. In addition, there are plenty of scopes for students who are looking for abroad studies. For example, English is becoming popular these days furthermore most of the universities and colleges are studying in English. As a result, foreign students communicate with their classmates who are from different nations so having an environment of one language they can communicate easily. Therefore it will help in their education. in short, getting easily conversation with anyone will help the younger generation.
Although there are lots of benefits of having fewer languages in the world, major advantage to grow their businesses. There are more opportunities to increase the growth of business and incomes. For instance, a number of brands are selling and earning from foreign nations. So having fewer languages they can communicate with overseas clients easily. As a result, they will expand their business and increase the sales of companies. However, some businessman can not communicate with foreign clients so they might not achieve success in the future. Overall, because of few options of languages will improve the quality of communication for the growth of business worldwide.
It is increasingly likely that more and more languages will die out every year. However, there has been required for communicating with anyone around the world. Ultimately, there are plenty of cons of fewer languages in the world.
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections untill 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...y will discuss why fewer languages will affect in positive ways in the future. If ther...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e language they can communicate easily. Therefore it will help in their education. in sho...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...refore it will help in their education. in short, getting easily conversation with...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25762711864 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72525507531 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501694915254 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5516229037 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6315789474 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5263157895 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327833318686 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10371109348 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104768729693 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232884048179 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123857485245 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.