The availability of food in developing and developed countries has seen a tremendous increase in recent decades. Unfortunately, so the amount of food thrown away has increased, both in commercial and housing. In this essay, I will discuss about the reasons for this phenomena and how it can be addressed.
Firstly, the main reason for the increase in wastage of food is the lack of planning skills among the masses. People are so busy; they do not plan about their healthy meals but relay on quick bites. For example, most of the working professionals do not do their groceries on regular bases, but only buy the stuff for the next day or believe in eating outdoors. Due to this, the food cooked in houses is wasted, and more dependence on restaurants gives a rise to commercial wastage.
Secondly, restaurants are keen to serve fast and fresh, so they keep half cooked food, which is perishable in nature, and to be consumed in limited time. However, the readiness of restaurants results in wastage. The restaurants do plan their meals, but there are chances that they might not reach the daily target of consumption. Moreover, they are even reluctant to give away the food items as it might affect the reputation.
The solution to the causes, however are quite simple. The NGOs can be active, as they can spread awareness for the proper give away methods. For example, an Indian Ngo Feeding India has initiated a campaign to collect the food from the restaurants or houses and distribute it to the poor and needy mankind. Even, the government can take initiative in making some laws about the total food to be cooked in a given day according to the customer’s visits. Moreover, individuals can become more conscious and plan their meals in a wise manner to nullify the wastage, or they can directly give away the left food to the poor.
To conclude, food is very important for living, and its wastage is a sin. So, the humans should be extra conscious and make the best of the food rather than throwing it in the bins.
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 61
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 78
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 73
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y, I will discuss about the reasons for this phenomena and how it can be addressed. ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ems as it might affect the reputation. The solution to the causes, however are ...
^^^
Line 7, column 523, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wise manner" with adverb for "wise"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ome more conscious and plan their meals in a wise manner to nullify the wastage, or they can dir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75423728814 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61560718351 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.451656951 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145385756167 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472083423767 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435509452366 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874228554417 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429583227264 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.