Over the last two decades there has been massive rise in international trade across the national borders which has become a debatable issue. While, some people argue that it beneficial for country's economy, others claim that it prevent local industries to flourish. In this essay I will discuss both the issue and present my opinion.
The proponents of global trade insists that free movement of goods can ensure the transparency of prices across the continent and there can be more consumer choice. The free trade can facilitate open markets, which can be ultimate social enterprise and major tool for tackling unemployment. The open markets can bring more potential consumers for business. It will also encourage mutual recognition-harmonised standards. As a result, each country produces something valuable, and sales it in every counties contributing to the world economy. For example, Apple products manufactured in USA, reaches to every corner of the world, collecting millions of revenues, thus contributing to the world economy. Dependence on the global trade helps to strengthen international cooperation and prevents war.
While , the opponents persists on the closure of the international free trade as it is threat to local business. When exporting becomes cheaper than producing the goods domestically, more jobs are lost, which can cause damage to local communities. There is a danger of inevitable competition, there monopolies can dominate. The economies may shrink and will be extremely difficult to regulate. The vast distance travelled by food, oil, and other products is harming the environment, thus make life unsustainable. And hence, Protectionists are in tight favour of free movement of trade internationally.
In conclusion, where there are convincing arguments on both sides of the debate, I strongly agree with the proponents of the global trade. It is not realistic for a country to use their source of energy, food, and manufactured goods within them. Global grade should not be restricted by any means.
- The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth while others claim that it damages local industries Discuss both views and give your own opinion You should w 91
- The freedom to work and live anywhere has become the main trend due to development of communication technology and transportation. Do the advantages of these development outweigh the disadvantages? Discuss. 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledgeor experience 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d major tool for tackling unemployment. The open markets can bring more potential c...
^^^
Line 5, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l cooperation and prevents war. While , the opponents persists on the closure o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44794952681 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13201390407 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593059936909 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3022754665 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8947368421 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6842105263 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191922144805 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520157452692 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591291749997 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128668269601 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989031895054 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.