In a global economy, many goods, including what we use on a daily basis, are transported from other countries in a long distance. To what extent do you think its benefits exceed its drawbacks?
Recent decades have witnessed an increase in imported goods, raising many questions of its substantial impacts on consumers’ living standards. Although the advantages could be pronounced, they are totally outweighed by the downsides.
On the one hand, it should be acknowledged that there are many benefits when it comes to imported products. First, consumers could purchase many high-quality products from other countries, which are manufactured and scrutinized in compliance with strict regulations. For example, Vietnamese citizens could consume many fresh fruits and vegetables imported from European countries instead of local ones which are mainly contaminated with carcinogenic coloring and preservatives. Second, The rise in imported products, as well as trade deals and negotiations among many countries correlates with the increased national revenues of every nation, thereby fostering the prosperity of the national economy.
On the other hand, imported goods could be fraught with numerous pitfalls. First, Imported products are invariably associated with the higher demand for vehicles such as airplanes and trucks for delivery. This would culminate in a higher concentration of carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere, worsening the overall air quality. In addition, Products from other nations are usually quite exorbitant stemming from high tariff and shipping costs. It is implied that these items would beyond the reach of individuals with limited incomes and exclusively within the affordability of the ones with strong purchasing power.
In conclusion, imported goods bestow more disadvantages than benefits despite some economic potential. The official authorities should undertake some initiatives to incentivise the consumption of local items for the long-term sustainability of the national economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-21 | nbquyen881 | 89 | view |
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries as poor countries need the workers more Do you agree or disagree 89
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote naturalenvironment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with thisdevelopment? 73
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 62
- Some people think international cooperation has brought benefits to world environmental protection while others believe more benefits have been brought to international business Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01520912548 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07301499928 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627376425856 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7332444066 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.692307692 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114513264857 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401697746038 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316928149395 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683058864557 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245157169664 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.