The government has the duty to ensure its citizen have a healthy diet, while others believe it is individual’s responsibility. Discuss both views and give tour own opinion.
In this contemporary setting, healthy lifestyle is given paramount significance. Some are of the opinion that the government is responsible for people’s healthy diet, other’s believe the individual should make their dietary plan. Considering this situation, it is crucial to explore this from two perspectives.
To begin with, there are several reasons why the government plays a pivotal role in ensuring the public eat healthily. To be specific, many fast foods tend to use attractive price and picture to entice people to have an unhealthy meal, so it is this appealing commercial effect that induces some young people to have no other choices. Therefore, the government should enact certain regulations to prevent unhealthy food promote their advertisements, especially targeting on young people who cannot afford the healthy meal. Thus, the government makes a significant contribution to ensuring people’s healthy diet. Besides, in order to lower the price of grocery products, many countries decide to import meats, fruits, and vegetables from different countries who specialize in exporting these things at a cheaper price. Consequently, the government should enforce quarantine inspections on these foods to clear out any unqualified and stale food out of the market. As a result, the government-oriented policy is an effective, efficient and pragmatic approach on people’s diet.
On the other hand, the public adopting their dietary plans has benefits too, as people can adjust their diets swiftly. To be precise, many individuals have a clear understanding of their own life disciplines. For example, some people have entire knowledge of diverse food they are allergic to. For this reason, people normally make a diet plan based on their body condition and food which should be excluded, thereby feeding healthy meals to their body. Hence, individuals might be fully responsible for their dietary plan. Moreover, people among different ages tend to know the right food to put into their bodies. This is mainly because different age groups require different nutrition level to maintain health. For instance, young children need to drink milk to grow faster and stronger, and old people want to eat more vegetables to digest easily, which provides them with a healthy diet to live on.
To sum up, it is apparent, the government has many legitimate concerns to ensure a healthy diet, such as restriction on advertisements, and safety inspections on imported foods. However, by no means should we turn a blind eye on the individual’s responsibility, which includes awareness of food allergy, and sufficient nutrition among different ages. Nevertheless, from my point view, government plays a vital role in keeping public health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-19 | quynhhuong656 | 95 | view |
- The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring program. Traffic calming was introduced in harper lane at the begging of 1999. 78
- Some people think watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 69
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies. 73
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies.Summarize the information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graphs below show where people first got their news both about the world and about local events between 1987 and 1997 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47775175644 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08727822679 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56206088993 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0226701507 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.380952381 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.80952380952 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206460045498 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689149557986 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693956955617 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14681374583 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040513199201 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.