Nowadays, the number of people who suffer from respiratory diseases such as lungs cancer and pneumonia are increasing at an alarming rate, and smoking is one of the main reasons which leads to this issue. Banning smoking in public places has been placed by some governments, even this has affected the freedom of living people. However, I completely agree with this point of view and I will give the reason why in this essay.
Let us start by looking at why smoking in public is such a bad thing for many people. First of all, smoking can bring about a harmful effect not only on smokers but also the people around them. As we have known, children's respiratory system is not as good as those of adults, so they are the one who most likely to be affected by the smoke. For example, when a man is smoking while he is waiting at the train station, the dispersion of smoke from his cigarette can be inhaled by the babies and their mothers sitting next to him. Furthermore, the notion of grown-ups smoking in front of a lot of people is considered a destructive behavior, which will severely affect children's actions in their later life as they will probably mimic what their parents were doing.
On the other side, while smoking or not lies on each personal willingness, it can be seen as selfish and unfair for those who are banned from public smoking. Some may argue that smoking is basically the same as the notion of wearing perfumes and colognes in public, as the fragrances are also dispersed to around area, affecting near people to a certain level. However, the effect is not so detrimental to the public, whereas smoke and ashes can severely damage people's health.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that whether to smoke or not depends on people's own choice. But, since cigarettes can only bring about more harm than good overall, publicly smoking should be managed through the way the government establishing preferential policies to restrict the amount of smoke being dumped into the atmosphere.
- The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 90
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 78
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of making children do exams 74
- It is generally agreed that fewer people today write letters through the mail or post compared with the twentieth century What factors have led to this situation What will the impact be on the lives of future generations 82
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats to our environment.What causes global warming?What solutions are there to this problem? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...ful effect not only on smokers but also the people around them. As we have known, childrens respirator...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...re banned from public smoking. Some may argue that smoking is basically the same as t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76217765043 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51365349073 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567335243553 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6660799408 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.846153846 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253310160736 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929359884723 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403396201752 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159305100908 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428448058789 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.