Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree.
It is an ongoing discussion among several countries on the importance of the government's investment in arts, music, and painting. Some people believe that it is unnecessary to divert government funds to such sectors. In my opinion, this is an important aspect that needs immense scrutiny by considering some prominent details which we will discuss in the forthcoming paragraphs with clear examples.
Firstly, the countries which predominantly depend on tourism for income must promote disciplines such as arts, music, and painting. Promotion of such sectors will contribute to add more engagement to tourists visiting the country. Arts, music, and painting can also be seen as an important medium to preserve the cultural heritage of the country. For example, the government of Kerala invests a good amount every year to conduct exhibitions for cultural festivals, to attract more tourists towards the beauty and intricacies of their tradition with art, music and painting as the core.
On the contrary, if the governments invest excessive funds in the development of such disciplines instead of focusing on other necessary developmental activities such as sanitation, medical facilities, and water supply which are necessary for well being of people. For example, the government of Kandhar has invested 50% of its income in building the world's largest statues and then engaging with disciplines such as arts, music, and painting for promoting its national heritage. Investing in government income in raising the statue has only further degraded the standard of living of people in the last 3 years.
To sum up, in my opinion, governments should carefully consider all aspects discussed above and plan the budget in such a way that investment in the development of arts, music, and painting without compromising on basic needs for a good standard of living of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | vidung | 90 | view |
- University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 73
- Most alcoholics purchase liquor legally. According to your point of view, should stores in general be legally allowed to sell liquor to alcoholics? 84
- Positive And Negative Effects Of Technology Information Through Mass Media 56
- Car-ownership has increased enormously. Is this good for traffic jam. What are the measures to be taken by government. 61
- Some democrats claim that people who do not take part in voting processes do not have the right to complaint about the situation their communities are in. What is your position regarding this opinion? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...eral countries on the importance of the governments investment in arts, music, and painting...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the largest'.
Suggestion: worlds the largest
...ested 50% of its income in building the worlds largest statues and then engaging with discipli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, well, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34237288136 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91832711521 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538983050847 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6901071758 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.272727273 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241786747792 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955404460085 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691840906773 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152678027703 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336561714546 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.