Money is spent on public transport by Government is always controversial. Some people believe that it is much more important to build railways than roads. This essay will discuss why spending money on the metro is superior.
Government should allocate more budget on rail lines because it is time-saving. Trains have the capability to get to the destination faster than road vehicles. Moreover, there is no traffic on their journey so it is much better to get to quickly. For example, there is a number of railway lines are constructed between two cities. As a result, citizens can reach their places speedily while travelling through the roads they might get stuck in the traffic. Overall, because of time-saving for the traveller while travelling via train so Government should spend money on railways.
If Government spends more money on trains, it will also affect pollution in a good way. Although building rail lines in any country, it signs of improving the atmosphere. For instance, there are plenty of vehicles which are driving on the roads such as bikes, cars and buses. In these types of vehicles, they need petrol or diesel so these fuels affect the quality of the air. The bad air cause a lot of health problems, which leads to breath diseases in humans. In the contrast, trains not to need any fuels. In short, spending money on trains are much more effective than on roads because of their positive impact on pollution.
It is increasingly likely that there are a lot of reasons for spending money on railway lines by way of alternative spending money on roads. Despite having some difficulties constructing railway lines, there are so many positive aspects.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 61
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 56
- the diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in short, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97163120567 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65817457247 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549645390071 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4496693588 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.8888888889 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22572057229 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685342636607 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575646960188 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150075983402 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298116394326 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.