governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Opinions are divided on whether authorities should allocate more budget on mass transit services such as railway and subway or developing infrastructure on the road. However, my firm conclusion is that railroads have more gain than roads.
There is an enormous advantage to promoting railway and subway for our society. First and foremost, trains are environment friendly, investing in railway would decline greenhouses gases emission. For instance, if individuals have easy and convenient access to the railway and subway, considering that transportation by train is cost-effective, they will be more likely to use it. As a result, air pollution and traffic congestion would be reduced considerably on roads because of the dropping the number of private vehicles, leading to global mitigation warming.
Secondly, trains are more reliable than other vehicles such as cars and buses. Railway transportation has the ability to transport under any weather condition along routes of any distance. Also, roads are far unsafer than railroads, according to lasts(2020) statistical published by the department of transport in the united kingdom. The fatalities in a road accident and the number of people injured seriously in a car crash 20 times more significant than trains, despite that fact train accident got more attention by media compare to bus and car crash, that means any shift from public to private transport would have a detrimental effect on safety, health, and environment.
In conclusion, it is true that some people still believe in private cars and expect the government to expend more money on roads than railroads. Nevertheless, it seems there can not be enough evidence to conclude that railways are vital for our society and our next generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below show the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season 56
- he bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 10
- Cam13test1task2 11
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or our society and our next generation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38989169675 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95214606087 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617328519856 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0979473467 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116964461296 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444029661679 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210742025439 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073453873632 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111798745853 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.