Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is a widely held belief that government should built railways but there are strong counter arguments by a section of people who prefer highways. I totally agree that a state should provide all possible methods to increase high-speed trains since it has more social and economical benefits for country.
First and foremost, train is on of the safety and convenient transport. According to UN, every year just one or two train accident happened in the worldwide. Moreover, trains are able to service huge number of passengers simultaneously and provide procurement heavy things such as coal, fossil fuel and metal. For example, Kazakhstan export thousands ton petrol and oil by train and this method of delivering ameliorate nations economy and GDP.
Secondly, trains are not harmful to environment and nature since it is not waste harmful toxics as a vehicle and a plane. Moreover, in the new era state-of-the-art trains are not use fossil fuel or gas. Modern trains controlled by a remote controls or a computers and use electric power that helps to preclude air pollution.
Thirdly, railways can stand for long time and an extra budget and an annual repairing is not necessary. I my opinion, authority spend more money to fix highways and roads every year since whether and heavy rain influences their quality. Kazakhstan, for example, divides million dollars for road repairing works every year.
To sum up, although there are a number of different points of view regarding this issue, railways length should expand as it foster country’s development and prevent nature damaging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- In many countries, young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. What do you think are reasons of these? Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- People nowadays are buying a wider range of household things for example television rice cooker than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 71
- Nowadays everyone likes to travel Some people travel alone while others prefer to travel in a group Discuss both approaches Give your own opinion with relevant examples from your experience 70
- Nowadays most people wear western clothing rather than their traditional clothes What are the reasons for it Is it a positive or a negative development 89
- Some people believe that manufacturers should be responsible for reducing the large amounts of packaging they use Others say consumers should avoid buying heavily packaged items Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons for your answer and in 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...eed trains since it has more social and economical benefits for country. First and forem...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 270, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ality. Kazakhstan, for example, divides million dollars for road repairing works every ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18604651163 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78311847621 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643410852713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4480078744 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.923076923 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898724281509 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280781749357 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350922429382 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519391556791 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414127306209 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.