Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some people are advocators of railways and argue that government should allocate money for building railways rather than building roads and highways. I believe that light railroad systems are beneficial for cities having traffic problems and pollution problems or high speed trains are timesaver so I defend railways for these reasons.
As everyone knows our world is polluted by fossil fuels and that fossil fuels are highly used in transportation. On the contrary, railways are mostly moved by electricity and it is one of the greenest fuel because it can be produced by sustainable energy resources such as wind and sun power. Because of this reason, electric powered light rail systems protect our environment as well as create less noise than internal combustion motors. Also, researchers indicates that in the future electricity mostly produced by renewable energy so it had better make investment to railways to protect world particularly in the downtowns where have air pollution.
For the city to city travel high speed trains are good alternatives to private cars and buses. They are both comfortable and they go many times faster than cars. Thus, railways would save people valuable times without compromising the comfort and safety. For example, car driver must pay his attention to road and obey the speed limits whereas this person could drink a cup of coffee or look astonishing views of the mountains.
For these advantages above popularity of trains increased but governments are reluctant to spend money on railways. I believe that if scope of railway is widened our world will become cleaner, cities will get rid of traffic problems and preference rate of trains will rise up.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so I defend railways for these reasons. As everyone knows our world is polluted ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, such as, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18545454545 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67396631762 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3919377817 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.833333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134324708531 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497695767395 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060014190325 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815120954906 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422295077111 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.