Some people are advocators of railways and argue that government should allocate money for building railways rather than building roads and highways. I believe that light railroad systems are beneficial for cities having traffic problems and pollution problems or high-speed trains are timesavers so I defend railways for these reasons.
As everyone knows our world is polluted by fossil fuels and that fossil fuels are highly used in transportation. On the contrary, railways are mostly moved by electricity. Electricity is one of the greenest fuel because it can be produced by sustainable energy resources such as wind and sun power. Because of this reason, electric powered light rail systems protect our environment as well as create less noise than internal combustion motors. Also, researchers indicate that in the future electricity mostly produced by renewable energy so it had better make investment to railways to protect world particularly in the downtowns where have air pollution.
For the city to city travel high-speed trains are good alternatives to private cars and buses. They are both comfortable and they go many times faster than cars. Thus, railways would save people valuable times without compromising comfort and safety. For example, car driver must pay his attention to road and obey the speed limits whereas this person could drink a cup of coffee or look astonishing views of the mountains on train. Indeed, there is a lot of demand to trains but relatively short railway network and governments' railway investments doesn't meet to demand so the highroods are preferred to go other cities.
For these advantages above the popularity of trains increased but governments are reluctant to spend money on railways. I believe that if scope of railway is widened our world will become cleaner, cities will get rid of traffic problems and preference rate of trains will rise up.
- Job fields 11
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feathers, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Job fields 11
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 550, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ork and governments railway investments doesnt meet to demand so the highroods are pre...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25245901639 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74505932762 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0322092204 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14284277742 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503508008666 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574323171644 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890346334805 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375373769795 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.