Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Presently, the question whether governments should allocate the excessive amount of budget on the railroads than highways has drawn much attention from the public. Although, both types of these roads are beneficial in their own way, in my mind, governments should take into consideration the environmental factors and the preferences of the citizens.
On the one hand, it would be absurd to overlook the role of railways in the life of modern society. Whenever the country possesses with the comprehensive rail networks, it positively affects the convenience and cost of logistics, by ensuring traders to send or receive the merchandise, crops and other immense quantity of goods by cheap prices. As a case in point, some countries, which have the diplomatic agreement and economical relationships have no other choice to lead international trades, unless there is a railway infrastructure established throughout the territory, providing the safest movement of the products. Thus, tobe equipped for becoming well industrialised society, the state should empower the rail networking system.
On the other hand, I still believe that roads should not be left without solicitude. Primarily, the governments should observe and the environment, before erecting railway, as some locations such as rocky mountains may be hazardous and investments unreasonable. In this case, government could focus on highways and ensure common folk with more facilities, by laying the route to the unexplored places. What is more, the air and noise contamination could be dwindled by manufacturing electric vehicles, and roads could be isolated from the outside world, improving the safety regulations. In other words, roads are providing the humanity enormous experience and opportunities, therefore, they should be preserved for the next generations.
From the given points, in my perspective, both of the itineraries play the role in converting the world to the industrialized society, and both of them should be subsidised with money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. 67
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects sho 73
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 84
- Holidays honor people or events. If you could create a new holiday, what person or event would it honor and how would you want people to celebrate it? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
Presently, the question whether governments should allocate the excessi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, such as, in other words, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55194805195 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17287372543 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.641298352 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156183118378 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546376388642 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298616552798 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901017822534 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219569149512 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.