Governments should spend money on railways rather roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is such a remarkable tendency that the number of countries owing railway systems had grown. Some people argue that it is high time that Government used more much money on railways instead of roads. From my view, do I both concur and dispute with this statement due to following reasons.
On the one hand, there are several benefits that railway lines should be invested rather than roads. First and for most, it is believed to be the most effective method of transportation in the future. Not only saving time but residents also gain little money. Buying ticket is more inexpensive than owing a private vehicle. Furthermore, moving from one place to another by trains is safer and quite quicker than by car or motorbike. Secondly, the more cutting-edge a variety of railways are namely subway and high-speed train, the less contaminated the air pollution is. Should individual means of transportation are minimized, CO2 will be eliminated dramatically that leads to the savage of public purse.
On the other hand, I disagree with this opinion due to the number of drawbacks. To begin with, it is such a long-lasting plan that the Government should take many factors into consideration namely geography, modern technologies, labour forces and burden as well. Providing that these conditions are not reasonable to adapt, either train or road transport will have bad quality. Instead of spending a huge amount of money developing railway system, enhancing current another type of transport is believed to be better. Next, the increasing in number of railways leads to many extra requirements. For example, both stations and automatic ticket machines should be set up. Moreover, tracks are necessary to be checked and improved frequently that consumes a numerous of public burden.
In conclusion, whether train is preferred to be manufactured to other forms of transport or not depending on how a country's situations and what the Government's policies are.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- The plan below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The given diagram indicates information about how used glass bottles are recycled. 56
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17610062893 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88125144766 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600628930818 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7593151297 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4444444444 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242962966041 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635995917064 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595701917477 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137704841873 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632980694345 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.