Competition in every field of life became a positive hope for our ancestors and they found it would become a beneficial for improvement at latter century after. Nowadays it is not seen like past. Several areas have developed due to the human race; however, few remaining could also become better. Both the aspects are elabotated in the ensuing paragraphs.
Out of all the betterment, the foremost one is that this contemporary world have a advanced technology due to the competition. Majority of nations not only developed high featured and energy efficient electronic gadgets, but also expand their boundries for reaserching some unimagine situations. Upgraded medical sector, educational premises and frequent transportation are results of the race between the nations to perform better at world level. Apart from that, global peace and mutual understanding for happy life were not possible in yesteryear. This 21st century is now global village, thus it is not surprising to see native and abroad students in one class for study or in one organisation to work.
Nonetheless, this continuity would also fruitful for solving presently ongoing debats. Firstly, social discrimination is the burnning issue to address by the mutual understanding. The identity of person is either based on their social or economical status nowadays. Hence Several world-wide measures are now started and will become successful in the near future. Increased unemployment, poverty and starvation rate will be automatically tackled after the healthy transaction and communication between this surged population. Secondly, pollution level will be levelled by the combinational efforts of citizens and the government. Establishment of eco-friendly society is gradually rising for the search of renewal energy and healthy environment for flora and fauna. This is clear illustration of shinning future.
To conclude, although human race has created a less errored globe, but it could also capable to find a path for the nature and world peace for the mankind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ne is that this contemporary world have a advanced technology due to the competit...
^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...rson is either based on their social or economical status nowadays. Hence Several world-wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...r social or economical status nowadays. Hence Several world-wide measures are now sta...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nature and world peace for the mankind.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, thus, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4872611465 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.033875372 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627388535032 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5013717189 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7222222222 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822814318755 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024645320118 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292700845378 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538312565886 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350397086416 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.