With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas?
Over the past decades, it is noticeable that the crisis of energy, especially for oil and gas has become more serious. Many people propose that we should meet our needs by looking for fossil fuel or crude oil in some remote and untouched natural places. While this tendency has several benefits, I hold an opinion that they could never overshadow the drawbacks for the following reasons.
On the one hand, people who are support the idea of discovering may argue that it will be a huge hitch for the world to stabilize the global economy. While the consumption of fuel is rising enormously because of the ever-growing population and the rapidly evolving industry. As a result, existing resources are running out. Economics research have shown that this will create ripple effect like inflation or slow-down the economy, but fortunately, this problem can be handle immediately by harnessing fuel and oil in far-away areas. Another pro can be taken into account is that it can help the citizens living in some rural areas indirectly. In most of the case, people who live in rural areas suffer from lots of inconveniences like poor public welfares. The investment in energy firms can be promising to the life-standard of the citizens by offering them jobs, enhancing infrastructure in order to lift them out of poverty.
On the other hand, notwithstanding the above-mentioned benefits, I would argue that it will be a grave mistake to overlook some potential harms of the seek for energy. Finding new sources of energy can ruin the balance of the environment, biological research have pointed out that, the mutuality independence of the ecosystem is the core value of the nature, although, it cannot be seen but exploding and building factories can lead to exert dire consequences and long-term effect. For example, soil erosion, flooding, push some wild animal to the edge of extinction and eventually, human beings will end-up fall into victim of themselves. Another disadvantage should be added is that the overdependence of fossil fuels leading to the ignorance of others alternative green resources. Many countries have success in finding available environmental friendly resources. For instance, wind, solar and tidal energy. In addition, the results come from state-of-the-art technologies will be more satisfying compare to fossil fuel.
In conclusion, although there are some advantages of exploding energy sources in some untouched areas, it is immature to ignore intangible problems as discussed above.
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 86
- With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas 89
- the bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 66
- table 11
- the chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in r different countries from 1997 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... drawbacks for the following reasons. On the one hand, people who are support ...
^^^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...res. The investment in energy firms can be promising to the life-standard of the citizens by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 929, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in order to lift them out of poverty. On the other hand, notwithstanding the a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1025, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more satisfying compare to fossil fuel. In conclusion, although there are some a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25310173697 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96710699698 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590570719603 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5832740635 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.611111111 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197749891537 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565416605659 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628057851532 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132866364057 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796705653231 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.