All the countries worldwide have been concerned about traffic proliferation and air pollution since engine vehicle usage increased.
So, solving these problems and finding the best way to deal with them is a controversial dispute in recent years. Some experts claim that increasing the fuel cost, such as petrol, is the best way to control traffic and air pollution. I believe that this viewpoint is not enough individually, and this problem can be solved with the contribution of various factors. On the one hand, fuel cost significantly affects people's decision to use their car. For instance, the high petrol price motivates people to use public transport. Because in these circumstances petrol price accounts for a large amount of living expense which can be decreased by public transport usage. Consequently, the number of cars in the street witnessed a decline, so the traffic and the pollution, which caused due to the cars, like sound and air decreased. Although increasing the petrol price can be a good way is not enough and other factors should participate in making it effective. For instance, the quality and quantity of subway, the bus should improve to encourage people to use them. If people have to wait long hours for public vehicles or do not have appropriate facilities like air-conditioning and comfortable chairs,
people's tendency to use them would decrease. Also, the technology of hydro-power cars is developing, and the government should pay more attention to this technology, which can reduce air pollution.
Having manifested aforementioned views and examples, rising the petrol price can be effective in traffic decrement. But, it can be called as the best solution if other measures like public transport quality boost,
simultaneously.
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'circumstances'' or 'circumstance's'?
Suggestion: circumstances'; circumstance's
... use public transport. Because in these circumstances petrol price accounts for a large amoun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...air-conditioning and comfortable chairs, peoples tendency to use them would decre...
^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...res like public transport quality boost, simultaneously.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30960854093 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98626771418 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583629893238 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5504176049 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192748255391 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698685964682 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543191905956 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100327568246 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783152190264 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.