Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The number of privately owned vehicles is growing day by day, these are the major factors to reduce the quality of air and high road traffic. Increasing the price of fuel is an effective solution for controlling the problems. This essay agrees with the statement because it demotivates the public to buy vehicles. This essay firstly discusses, the influence of people to shift to cheaper transport medium because of growing fuel price, secondly, the electric motors and long railways will be the best solution.
First of all, the growing fuel price shifts the use of petrol and diesel motors and start for public and cheap methods of transport. This method can significantly help in reducing the number of transport, also it impacts environmental and congested road problems. for example, raising fuel price make a ride costly and limits the KM they travel if the user used to travel 25 with $10 after raising it charges about double than earlier. Economically such factors are massive at a certain time interval and give a chance to shift the mode of transport.
So, the alternative source like an electric motor and fast-moving mono-rail help to reduce the biodegradation. Those cars and buses which run with a clean energy source don't release any toxic and harmful gases to the surroundings also they are eco-friendly. Such motors are even fast and effective and cheap to travel a long distance. In Nepal, two decades ago there was a trolleybus it is run by electricity, during that period there were no traffic-jam and surrounding was so clear. Such metros and buses can be a good alternative for the transport which saves our environment from the harmful gases released by petrol vehicles.
In conclusion, raising price can reduce and control both an environmental as well as traffic problem, also the electric motors and buses can resolve these problems completely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | chioma49 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 78
- The graphs below show the enrollments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period. 73
- The charts below show what UK graduate and post graduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 78
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home, leisure and work activities. To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevan 78
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ironmental and congested road problems. for example, raising fuel price make a ride...
^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: CHANCE_CHANGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...e at a certain time interval and give a chance to shift the mode of transport. So, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...es which run with a clean energy source dont release any toxic and harmful gases to ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...educe and control both an environmental as well as traffic problem, also the electric moto...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04180064309 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75878997694 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556270096463 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2482682416 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119264288101 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423657756282 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407041718525 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074893892795 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047917929157 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.