International community must act immediately to ensure all nations to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels e.g. gas and oil
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that international community must take immediate action to make sure all countries to reduce the amount of fossil fuel burned for energy. In my opinion, I completely agree with this idea because alternative energy resources, that are used to lessen negative impacts of fossil fuels on the natural environment, are increasingly available.
Excessive consumption of fossils fuels results in environmental degradation, including global warming and natural resource depletion. First, Carbon dioxide, which is believed to be the principal cause of climate change over the years, emitted from the process of using fossil fuels. Global warming as a consequence of the high concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere triggers more extreme weather events namely floods, hurricanes and prolonged heatwaves. Second, natural resource shortage should be significantly considered where natural resources are being exploited and used in an uncontrolled way. Hence, cutting down on CO2 emission by reducing the dependence on fossil fuels is the most effective method for alleviating such environmental problems.
International policies encouraging all countries to utilize alternative energy resources are more feasible. A growing number of people worldwide are able to use renewable resources with a reasonable price thanks to the fact that generation of the energy is much more productive. For example, it is unreliable that German government has recently planned to pay customers for electricity usage as windfarm creates huge power surplus. However, in contrast with Germany and other developed countries, developing nations encounter economic and technological challenges when they construct energy generation systems. Therefore, aid package from rich countries should be provided in order to ensure all nations to reduce simultaneously their consumption of fossil fuels.
In conclusion, I completely advocate with the idea that global community has to act urgently to reduce the fossil fuel consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-23 | Vikram_IELTS4 | 67 | view |
- Many people think that increasing business and cultural contacts between countries is a positive development. However, others believe that these are leading to the loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones. What problems can this create? What are some solutions? 78
- it is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Art classes such as painting or drawing are important for children s development so it should be compulsory in high school Do you agree or disagree 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 576, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an uncontrolled way" with adverb for "uncontrolled"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... resources are being exploited and used in an uncontrolled way. Hence, cutting down on CO2 emission by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82372881356 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0862168219 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623728813559 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.2127955022 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.153846154 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226475272149 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792231313226 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820858300355 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150899801319 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556967879984 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.