International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not.
Travelling abroad become more familiar nowadays for tourist. It is argued that this situation offering positive impact for other section. I completely agree that overseas tourism can giving a positive impact, explained by two reasons.
First of all, globe-trotting teach us to become an open-minded person. Learning new language or new tradition open our minds to accept the differences among people in this world so that we can prevent any discordance caused by ethnic or cultural differences. Rohingya crisis, for example, which still ongoing no better development for this situation. If the people of Myanmar want to be open-minded and want to learn and receive Rohingya culture, this country would be safe and peaceful.
Other than that, international tourism helping the economy to move. Tourism is one of the profitable industry for every country. Country receive an income from tax and visa that payed by the tourist so the more tourist come, the more foreign exchange to get. One country that relies on income from tourism industries is Maldives. This country is only a small country in the Indian ocean but have a lot of beautiful beach and amazing panoramic sea. They rely from tourism foreign exchange to fulfill their needs.
To sum up, the amount of international tourism increased significantly rather than before. Some people wary that this condition can cause negative impact such as the entry of foreign cultures and national security but in my opinion the opposite is true. Overseas tourism can teach people about new culture and knowledge and become the trigger to economic wheel for a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 78 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USAbetween 1920 and 2000. 56
- Birth Rate 61
- the internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades.Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of thistechnology has been positive. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, as to, for example, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17938931298 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66242919591 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603053435115 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5078637588 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8125 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187924257294 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666473275671 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581337449476 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114613580096 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438679509023 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.