While, travelling around the world we meet different people who have different lifestyle. One of the most controversial issue today relates to that, people become highly prejudiced rather than open-minded due to international tourism. In this essay, I will embark the light on reasons why this happen and suggest some remedies to reduce this.
Categorially speaking, the major role is to examine why person set this type of mentality while international travelling. As we know that this worls consist thousands of traditions. So I guess especially; rituals boost up the negative thinking of person. Along with this, we can take an example of behaviour, like person belong to Asain country travel to arabic country. The outcome of this tour is that while passing through other traditions; their mentality set as prejudiced person not as open-minded. Aside from this, if we want to curb this problem we could take a help of some universal known organisations like United Nations Organisation. By the help of this make a website which includes data about the lifestyle of other nations.
The another reason behind this issue is restrictions of other nation. For instance, driving rules of other country. Like in some countries driving rules are much lenient but, in mostly arab countries such as Dubai has highly strict rules. Due to this, a person has always fear while driving. This phobia leads to change person mind. Hence, this issue could be solve by make some knowledge related programmes which includes rules and regulations of other nation.
In conclusion, international tourism does have its problems which can lead to prejudiced views. However, efforts in the right direction can overcome them.
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce the consumption for fossil fuels such as gas oil and coal To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement Give your own opinion 88
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 75
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 73
- In some countries, it is illegal for an employer to reject job applications on the basis of age criteria. Is it a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
While travelling around the world we meet dif...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ntality while international travelling. As we know that this worls consist thousan...
^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rls consist thousands of traditions. So i guess especially; rituals boost up the ...
^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'feared'.
Suggestion: feared
...rules. Due to this, a person has always fear while driving. This phobia leads to cha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, i guess, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20983606557 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73360053579 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567213114754 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7453312733 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2777777778 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202706657519 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648037859875 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404882957457 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13306370295 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319557110732 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.