It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations
and better language skills than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or
disagree?
Some people think that reading for pleasure increases people’s imagination and language skills more so than watching TV does. I agree with this view and will analyze the reasons in the following essay.
Reading for enjoyment can help people to develop their imagination and improve their language skills in many ways. Firstly, while watching television is said to be more of acquiring knowledge passively, reading is considered to be an active form of learning. Reading stimulates people’s
brains more as they have to use their imagination to visualize the characters and plot of the
story, and this helps to further develop their imaginative thinking skills. Secondly, language skills can also be improved from reading. By reading regularly, people can expand their
vocabulary and learn different grammatical structures and how to use them effectively. Watching TV, on the other hand, does little to enhance people’s imagination and language skills. While reading, people have plenty of time to read the text and visualize the content of the story. However, when watching TV, viewers use their imagination very little, as they can see the images on the screen. Furthermore, the dialogue of the story or movie is usually spoken at a fast pace, which does not give viewers much time to comprehend what is being said, let alone learning anything new. Finally, television is full of advertisements these days and therefore distracts viewers from what they are watching. This makes it even more difficult for people to absorb information that might enhance their language skills. In conclusion, I believe that reading books is a more efficient way for people to enhance their imagination and language skills while watching TV is simply more of a source of
entertainment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-18 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100000 people asking if they travelled abroad for the period 1994 1998 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 61
- Today food travels from thousands of miles from the farm to the consumer Some people say that it would be better for the economy and environment if people ate food produced from local farmers 73
- Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree disagree 61
- Some people say that modern buildings are ugly and are ruining our towns and cities especially when these buildings are very different from those around them Others say that they add variety and interest Discuss both views and give your own opinion 59
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and better language skills than people who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...eading stimulates people’s brains more as they have to use their imagination to v...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27464788732 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78560074555 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6093886802 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374049103662 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143480951384 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115938506571 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229213082697 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953598237697 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.