It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
it is sometimes argued that government should build public spaces such as squares and parks in cities and towns. I completely disagree with this idea.
The argument in favour of the construction of public spaces would be that modern society needs large and fresh spaces in order to excercise, meeting, playing and so on. In other words, public spaces have attractive areas and fresh air which are suitable for outdoor activities. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted view. To establish public spaces entails a great amount of cost, time and personnel, including expensive old tree, park bench, time for growing plants and other heavy materials. While government are still stuck with burdensome problems from pollution to literacy, it sounds a luxurious to standardise all cities with the existence of such buildings.
Several cities whose area is narrow find themselves unable to afford large squares and parks. In some circumstances, if government wanted spaces to build public areas in small cities, they would have tension in resident’s home. As a result, citizens who are forced to leave their living places are migrating to uncomfortable buildings. Another potential problems might be vandalism of the garden or drug addicts and prostitutes using large ares in evening hours as a hang-out. Consequently, public areas, which are thought to be attractive by its beauty, are becoming dangerous places because of criminals. For example, children’s naive can be used by drug dealer to transfer banned substances in the park.
In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made by government to avoid these problems, and it would be counterproductive to build more squares and parks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | Sarah Zalkifal | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Sarah Zalkifal | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Anmol Thukral | 61 | view |
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools How far do you agree with this prediction 54
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 78
- The graph below shows the percentage change in the number of international students graduating from universities in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 89
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
it is sometimes argued that government s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is sometimes argued that government sho...
^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome problems from pollution to literacy, it sounds a luxurious to standardise all...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32234432234 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93582831103 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600732600733 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2832446052 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.785714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267469472558 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088892088879 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595130020087 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167849071561 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855911175018 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.