It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some opinions assume that governments should only allocate resources on taking care of their own residents because helping all people globally is impossible. I totally disagree with this statement because we have some reasons why governments should share the burden of global responsibility together.
In terms of transporting advantages, it is clear that people nowadays take place aid-purpose transportations more easier than before.thanks to the availibility of modern means of transportation. For example, governments can send a huge amount of aid goods to remote locations in the opposite hemisphere by planes. Furthermore, the surge in establishing NGOs on over the world is a beneficial motivation to promote relief activities. These such organisations make charities become more easier and more accesible when someone want to contribute money or force to support poorer countries. WHO is a typical example, which provides youngsters with a diverse range of meaningful charitiy.
From a perspective of social responsibility, although authorities absolutely have to be accountable for their own citizens, there are many ethical reasons why governments should give supports other countries. We sometimes have to face with some setbacks which can not be solved by only one single nation. For instance, humans today are confronting with many serious consequences caused by covid-19 pandemic, in which international collaborations should be taken into consideration
In conclusion, I completely disagree that governments should merely concentrate on people in their own countries due to both technological and social reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-01 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012. 67
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called pentland from 1950 and 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below 15
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012. 73
- Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... take place aid-purpose transportations more easier than before.thanks to the availibility ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...uch organisations make charities become more easier and more accesible when someone want to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
... easier and more accesible when someone want to contribute money or force to support...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80416666667 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35683123976 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0370487308 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.3 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231991422073 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079726999947 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875924248828 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16177751938 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984534788516 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... take place aid-purpose transportations more easier than before.thanks to the availibility ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...uch organisations make charities become more easier and more accesible when someone want to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
... easier and more accesible when someone want to contribute money or force to support...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80416666667 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35683123976 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0370487308 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.3 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231991422073 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079726999947 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875924248828 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16177751938 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984534788516 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.