It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree

Some people claim that governments should entirely concentrate on their citizens only instead of assisting all people around the world. While it is true that authorities need to support their own individuals, I would argue it is also possible to help other people in the world.

To begin with, there are some reasons why government should focus on people in their home countries. Firstly, when authorities care for and support to solve their difficulties, which positively improve their standard of living. This allows reducing the rate of social evils. For example, the government provide disadvantaged groups such as homeless or disabled people, with job opportunities, which helps them to afford themselves and share financial burden with their families. If the government do not give them a hand with these problems, they might engage in illegal activities such as theft and fraud. Secondly, this trend helps build citizen trust in government. As a result, individuals will support governments’ campaigns and obey the regulation better. If authorities do not care about their inhabitants, which might negatively create opportunities for those people who oppose the state.

However, I believe that we can also assist people coming from all parts of the world. First, we can have a good relationship with other nations. This promotes peace and stability, therefore, we can boost the sustainable development of the planet. Additionally, assisting citizens in other countries, to some extent, is synonymous to helping people in the home country. For instance, in 2004, the UK and the US doctors and nurses to Africa to deal with the outbreak of Ebola, which could prevent this dreadful plague from spreading to other nations, including the UK and the US themselves.

In conclusion, while supporting inhabitant in the home country can bring a number of advantages, I believe that governments also gain greater benefits from assisting people around the world.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35806451613 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89640956107 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577419354839 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7169359027 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299061486537 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976326756481 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938311172005 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195386652155 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103105388893 0.056905535591 181% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.