Sentiments diverge on whether a government should dispense university educational services on a large scale for youngsters. Although some formidably censure this stance, I advocate it owing to several rational reasons.
Undeniably, it is feasible to offer university places for majority of young people. First, cost of infrastructure for the buildings dedicated to education is too expensive. It can be explained by the fact that the construction of myriad facilities without attrating investors will bring financial pressure on the government. In addition to this, overpaying for infrastructure investment can prevent the government from allocating sufficient financial resources to quality education. To be more accurate, the government can be struggling for finding investment and human resources to train the teachers who meet the minimum requirements.
Further and even more prominently, it is pointless to create multiple university educational opportunity for youngsters. The blooming of universities will cause the entrance standards of universities to drop significantly. The imbalance in the workforce is the result of graduates without the right direction and the soaring of unemployment Worse than, disturbance in the labor market for a long time due to imbalance in workforce can lead to economic stagnation.
By way of conclusion, I strongly suppose that dispensing university educational services on a large scale for youngster is feasible and unnecessary.
- Many things can influence the academic achievement and emotional growth of a student In this regard peers have more of an impact than teachers do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 11
- The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007 in grams
- The graph below gives information about daily salt intake in the USA in 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irection and the soaring of unemployment Worse than, disturbance in the labor mar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 216.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8287037037 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40780681536 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.197796087 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20004482894 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083778381242 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650206710199 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116537892462 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264577049817 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.