library should provide more books rather than new tecnology such as computer and e-books. What extend do you agree or disagree.

Essay topics:

library should provide more books rather than new tecnology such as computer and e-books. What extend do you agree or disagree.

Knowledge is free at the library. Just bring your own container. Today my topic related to library provide more books or provide new technology such as computer and e-books.I agree with this statement.

First week paper books is more useful rather than their Technology such as computer or e-books because all the books do not find online. the specialist books are still in paper form because the famous writer do not upload our books on the internet. Second reason is people do not easily focus on online book reading. Foe instace, some time people read the book online and friend send the message. With this mind go on this side and people do not read the book. Thirdly, the old prefer to read the paper books because old people do not use mobilephone, computer, and othe new technology things.

secondly, on the technology things spend more money rather than books. Firstly buy the new computer, provide the internet facilities, and buy new tables and chairs. Furthermore, there need more space for computer in library. Every people will have own computer in library because they save the data in computer and do not share own data with other.
To conclude, the ample people read the paper books rather than new technology such as computer and e-books. People easily focus on the paper books because not think for anyone and read own books.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-20 PRAMODH k 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...technology such as computer and e-books.I agree with this statement. First week ...
^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...cause all the books do not find online. the specialist books are still in paper for...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...puter, and othe new technology things. secondly, on the technology things spend more mo...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 41.998997996 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82683982684 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25076587853 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.042718262 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3333333333 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35595141334 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128066999096 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105709240104 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244967950664 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276259779414 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.