In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different opinions about whether the government should introduce a maximum salary. While I accept that the limitation of employee remuneration is necessary, I believe that people should let to earn as much as they can.
There is a need for the government to constraint the amount of wage. The pay-gap between bosses and employees are reduced, which cause workers to demotivate because they feel that the situation is unfair. Furthermore, introducing maximum wage that seems to feasible to increase minimum wage. As a result, the poverty and crime rate will fall due to the general population will have a better quality of living.
However, I disagree that the income of those who make great money above average levels are limited. First, these well- paid employees are likely to be highly motivated to work hard that drive their business successfully, so the company will become thrilling and prospective. Second, it is fair enough that those who spend a lot of time on work to complete challenging tasks can get their dream salaries. For example, a CEO who take responsibility for securing company run smoothly, developing products and analyzing strategies deserves to have admirable wage thus they seem to make a large profit for their company. Finally, if a company offer a good salary, they are able to attract the best talented. For instance, many skillful expert programmers and the best graduates from the whole world want to take part in Facebook company since they pay the huge sums.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the development of countries would be better when people have freedom to get their well- paid incomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | marin123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Shweta sahu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | kaushii | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Dolang | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 73
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can the government do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0695970696 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69102907517 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4610769203 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.461538462 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132160253886 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463593576595 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040229125174 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807390295001 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563018928009 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.