Many countries spend a lot of money in art Some people think investment in art is necessary but others say money is better spent on public services and facilities Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Whether the government should spend money on art or in improving health and education has become a controversial issue. While some people argue that funding to art is essential for every nation, others believe that budget is better to be assigned to improving health and education. This essay will discuss Although art and history represent the culture of countries, why investment in health and education is superior.
On the one hand, proponents of this idea that the government should devote a large amount of money for art always have their reasons. They believe that art is a part of the culture and heritage of people which inherited from their ancestors and should be appreciated. Indeed, they often refer to the Renaissance and the influence of the art on emerge of the revolution. For these reasons, some claim that devoting budget on art sector is essential.
On the contrary, many think that healthcare and education facilities have priority rather than art. They contend it is justified according to Maslow's hierarchy of need, the fundamental needs of anyone are including health, food, clothes, etc. Furthermore, someone who is not well-educated will not be able to understand artworks which can indicate that importance of two essential factors on human life. For instance, if a person has only a few dollars while is hungry or ill will not purchase artwork or will not go to a museum. Hence, people who advocate the theory that investment in health and education is superior rather than art have rational reasons for their claims.
Prioritization has a significant role in the dedication of the budget in every government. This essay discussed why art is a significant heritage of every nation as should be allocated budget on it but why the basic needs include health and education should be a priority over art. After looking at both side of this argument, it is felt that if every country can provide the fundamental necessities of people, they should be spent money on other sections such as art and history.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt in health and education is superior. On the one hand, proponents of this idea...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, well, while, for instance, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99115044248 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76234748078 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504424778761 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1863425724 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230954230527 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830419806267 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584360143729 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148791427911 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447980388702 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.