Education has been recognized as vital in society around the world. Nowadays the controversy as to which type of school is more favorable to the children has incurred people’s concern. It is often argued that children going to the single-sex schools will lead to disadvantaged consequence in the future. In my view, I disagree with the given statement and I believe both mix-schools and single-sex schools have beneficial effect on the children. My opinion will be elaborated two sided as follows.
Having education in single-sex schools is advantageous to children as it makes children more concentrated in their studies. This suggests that children who study in the single-sex school could pay more heed to their academic work without the distraction of other gender. To demonstrate, it is apparent that children having education in the mix-schools often spend less time in studying because many of them spending massive amount of time cultivating intimate relationship with the other gender. In this case, children are incapable of emphasizing on their academic performance, and therefore, inflict grave learning results. Hence, having schooling in single-sex schools is beneficial to children.
On the other hand, mix school could exert positive impact on the children as well because children could acquire more social ability which the single-sex school could not do. Owing to the mix-gendered environment, children in mix-school are given more opportunities to communicate and interact with the other gender people. To demonstrate, male students are capable to cultivate relationship with female students in the mix-schools. Given the fact that social capability is essential in the future employment career, having education in mix-schools is certainly favorable to children.
By way of conclusion, as argued above, I firmly believe that there are merits in both single-sex schools and mix-schools. It is imperative that the parents should prudently considerate which type of schools is suitable to their children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, so, therefore, well, as to, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57741935484 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0612971209 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487096774194 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4953218749 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405491220171 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166547480313 0.084324248473 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114809739642 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28197142295 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569453742589 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.