Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal some people however think that other types of progress and equally important for a country

A group of people argue that most of the government believes that economic progress has more significance, while others have different views and opine that other kinds of progress, like infrastructure, have the same significance for a country. However, economic growth is also important for the country; it helps in the agriculture sector, and so on. I believe that other types of progress, like technology and education, are equally necessary for a country.
First and foremost, with good and high GDP, people will not face problems, for example, with a high GDP population others can easily get profit from their own agriculture and business sector. If the country has no high population then obviously that country's citizens will not be able to develop their own businesses and that nation will also step back from every kind of competition. It is not acceptable that economic progress is the only sector for a country's progress, but it is its main character.
On the other hand, other types of progress, like hospitals, schools, and infrastructure, are also equally important for the government. They have to focus on every kind of progress to improve their nation's status. Focusing on only one goal will not be effective for growth. Laws should give equal priority to every sector. For instance, in the USA, the government is concerned with each and every aspect of progress equally, so the USA holds the highest ranks in improving the nation, and that country is one of the most developed countries compared to others.
In conclusion, in order to improve the nation's status, focusing on only one goal will not be effective; however, other progress, like in hospitals and the education sector, is equally important for development. I believe that other progress is also necessary for the growth of the nation.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... In conclusion, in order to improve the nations status, focusing on only one goal will ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77820085667 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476666666667 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6043367018 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362371679235 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151331723195 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871040522615 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249397828081 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681964730401 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.