Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
We human beings are thriving in this world primarily because of our intelligence. Museums are the go to places of modern people to dive deeper into a certain aspect of knowledge such as science, arts, and early human-forms. The prompt asserts that most of the museums charge a fee while others are free of charge. I mostly agree with the contention that advantages of charging people for admission does outweigh the disadvantages, although I do concede that in some situations or instances the disadvantages are more detrimental.
First of all, there has to be a system that makes the museums sustainable. In most of the museums, there are staffs such as expert people related to the museums themes work, and the usual staffs such as tour guides, souveneir shop keepers, genitors, and so on. These people have monthly salaries, and also a infrastructure of a museum has other monthly payments such as electricity bills, water bills, and gas bills. Hence, to pay-off salaries and utility bills of any museum, a sustainable system is needed. As, most of the museums in every country are state runned ones, there are subsidies from the government itself, still there are gaps in the pay-offs where admission charges come into the scenerio to fill the void. Thus, the admission charges are an absolute must for every museums.
Secondly, most of the meusums are built at least a couple of decades ago, ergo, renovations are needed often. To renovate a whole museum or a portion of it, is not a little task. It needs time and money. And, most of the museums have a system, where a portion of the admission fees go into the fund for next renovation of the mesuem, Without the renovations, the mesuems lose its attractiveness to its visitors. Therefore, renovations play a major role in keeping a museum up to date with the needs of its visitors.
However, in the third world countries, it is next to impossible to charge a fee for admission in museums. As, most of the people are living under a poverty line, it is a bad idea to charge the people. Another measure should also be put into action on the museums which do charge a fee is that they should provide waivers to old citizens, school children, and students whogo to the museums to research. These will put a nice balance to the whole situation.
In conclusion, museums should charge for admission as it is a gateway for the museums' sustainability and renovations. But, also they should have a system to waiver the charges to the people who are unable to pay and the students who are researching.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... prompt asserts that most of the museums charge a fee while others are free of ch...
^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... people have monthly salaries, and also a infrastructure of a museum has other m...
^
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y salaries, and also a infrastructure of a museum has other monthly payments such...
^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Secondly, most of the meusums are built at least a couple of decades ago, ergo, ...
^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'museums'' or 'museum's'?
Suggestion: museums'; museum's
...or admission as it is a gateway for the museums sustainability and renovations. But, al...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thus, while, as to, at least, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 443.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76297968397 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71819665641 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503386004515 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0410277814 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.476190476 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0952380952 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356581307289 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104511819514 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109441066708 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206697333242 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626801885852 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.