Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, many tourist attractions are present globally which are offered and promoted by the government and one of them is museum. Museums also preserve and represent the history, traditions and many other important aspects of a country. In some museums, there is a policy that the visitors have to pay money before entering while others are free to visit. I certainly believe that the applied policy i.e. charging visitors for museum entrance derives more benefits than drawbacks.
First and foremost, money collected from the visitors can be utilised to maintain and develop the museum. For instance, it can be used to cover the utility bills, repairing costs, renovation and staff costs. Maintaining a large museum costs a huge amount of money and the revenue earned from the visitors could be a good source of money to do that. Not all museums are funded by the government and sometimes museum‘s fund is not enough to cover all the costs it requires. If no money is taken from visitors, such museums would have to be shut down. So admission fee in museums seems very utilitarian to maintain a better museum.
Furthermore, due to applied tariff, inhabitants who enter a place providing scientific or historical values are likely to spend their leisure time there and do not enter unnecessarily. For example my sister, Lia tends to read carefully the available information provided in the museum and one of the reasons she does that because she wants to get some value from the money she spent. This example makes clear that admission money is seemly very utilitarian to encourage and educate the visitors to use facilities offered maximally.
On the other hand, entrance fee in museums possibly reduce the guests because most of the people prefer to come to places and spend idle time that can be entered without any money. To illustrate, a garden located in the city gets more visitors than the other amusement parks which require a ticket to enter. The people in the garden go to walk, gossip and to chat with others which should not be the case in a museum. Only interested and real visitors in a museum would make it a better place for people to learn and visit.
In a nutshell, although admission charge will attract fewer visitors in a museum in many cases, considering the purpose of a nice museum and to cover the expenses it requires, the entry fees seem have more advantages than the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-25 | ulligadda sreeja | 56 | view |
- nowadays people prefer to shop in large supermarkets rather than nearby local shops why do you think this happens is this a positive or negative try and give your opinion and example from your own experience 62
- Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more important than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Due to technology, our traditional skills and was of living is altered. we can not prevent these change. what extent do u agree or disagree? 73
- Many people believe that government should have to pay for education and health service. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 78
- hould museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance? Discuss this issue, and give your opinion. 67
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in many cases', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243362831858 0.247107183377 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.190265486726 0.155533422707 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0774336283186 0.0946595960268 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0398230088496 0.0501214627716 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0243362831858 0.0437548338989 56% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0973451327434 0.122226691241 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0420353982301 0.0403226058552 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58010964569 2.80594681477 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0486725663717 0.0326793684256 149% => OK
Particles: 0.00221238938053 0.00163938923432 135% => OK
Determiners: 0.110619469027 0.0861772015684 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0176991150442 0.021408717616 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0110619469027 0.011925033212 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2423.0 1933.35771543 125% => OK
No of words: 412.0 316.048096192 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88106796117 6.12580529183 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20517956788 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361650485437 0.374742101984 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.257281553398 0.28420135186 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169902912621 0.203846283523 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106796116505 0.137316102897 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58010964569 2.80594681477 92% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.037074148 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519417475728 0.56093040696 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 58.3023717435 60.7387585426 96% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6842105263 20.7743622355 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9414899477 49.517814964 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.526315789 127.492653851 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.7743622355 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.814263465372 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 47.4123658661 49.1944974215 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.50434782609 1.69124875643 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358394087243 0.332605444948 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108494150301 0.102741220458 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0633043860264 0.0668466124924 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.550526117336 0.534860350844 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172603409853 0.148594505496 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139234890076 0.134430193775 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490440634714 0.0742795772207 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.425257705003 0.324371583561 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0181838849138 0.0638462369009 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243149709779 0.228012699653 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027691533771 0.058150111329 48% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.68436873747 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 5.90881763527 203% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.4468937876 163% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.