Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
It has become a common phenomenon that criminals who finished their serving in prison tend to break the law and end up in jail again. In my opinion, not only insufficient rehabilitation services offered by government or non-profit organizations but also the nature of justice system design contributes to this tragic situation. In order to make a change to it, much efforts have to be taken by both government and the whole society.
One major reason why prisoners end up in jail again is that there is no effective rehabilitation help, which could help them restart a new life. Especially under the social norms which people would in general discriminate a person with “records”, which means criminals don’t really have a second chance as employers and family would distant themselves from offenders out of social pressure. There are many examples that ex-criminals walked out of cell and became homeless, resulting in committing another crime to make a living. Perhaps for them the indifference of society makes prison a better place simply for the purpose of surviving.
However, the rooted problem is that the design of entire justice system is to punish people who break the law instead of reducing crimes for the goodness of the whole community. Indeed, the fact that running a federal prison is a privatized profit-making business benefits from more crimes, which unfortunately makes the destiny of an offender doomed. In other words, there is no ethic or incentives to improve the lives for a criminal in this mechanism.
In order to change this awkward situation, it needs not only the reform of justice system which should be aimed at rehabilitation instead of punishment but also the corroborative efforts by the rest of the society to help them to restart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-13 | http_essay | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | elven | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Gurvi singh | 61 | view |
| 2017-01-12 | http_essay | 78 | view |
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava."The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of students en 66
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-1011.*includes French, German and Spanish 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.*includes French, German and Spanish 73
- Some people think that money is one of the most essential factors in promoting happiness Do you think people can be happy without much money What other factors contribute towards happiness 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ation. In order to make a change to it, much efforts have to be taken by both govern...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, second, so, in general, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12627986348 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99783456504 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580204778157 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6654886045 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.545454545 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128360836228 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465923147422 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258253808206 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768090541198 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166759669569 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.