In our present world there are more than enough organisations, facilities, equipment or people that can serve for people's security. Even though, not all the states' governments can provide their citizens with one-hundred-percent safety and it is obvious why people are afraid of leaving their houses. When it comes to how humans can forestall any kind of crime, all of the people have different and opposing points of view: while some of them believe there has to be taken more action, others state that not all the measurments can be afforded.
Given situation is particularly common in countries with high crime rates. On the one hand, the ones who think there have to be taken more actions, are right in some extent. The simplest and the first action that may, even if not completely, guarantee people's security is to install high-quality window and door locks. Next, governments can set or mend CCTVs and night lights in the places where they are absent or out of order. They can hold meetings and guiding lessons for locals in order to help them self-defence on a weekly or monthly basis. Moreover, administrations can encourage policee officers to work more hardly and decrease the level of crime rates with bonuses,rewards or prizes. The very people's acknowledgemnt of that government and police are trying for them is one of the main points to consider, because if the population itself does not have any desire to cooperate with the mentioned people, there will not be any offset or progress in the assigned task. Another important point is that children are ought to be brought up in the right way, so that in future possible unpleasant troubles could be prevented
I completely disagree with those who argue that a liitle actions can be carried out regarding to the cases of crime and their duration. Still, their opinion can be supported by several factors. There is no guarantee that all the cameras and night lights will be working all the time and those who are in charge of them will regularly inspect their serviceability; there is no warranty that police workers will act and serve with reponsible attitude; there is not any warranty that governments will provide humans with all demaned equipment and guidelines, mentioned above. We cannot either predict or guees the course of action of criminals. The lack of funding may be another annoying drawback. It is all true. Yet, if all the basic actions are observed, the crime levels can be minimised and to suspend people fear of leaving their apartmnets. Besides, worldwide organisations, such as UNO or UNESCO, could help with some of the problems.
To conclude, I strongly feel that more actions should be taken with regard to crime rates , even if they are not that high in all of the countries, considering people's attempt and feeling of responsibility of their own and each others' safety.
- Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people say that products should be designed to last as long as possible Others say that it is more important for products to be as cheap as possible 74
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...humans can forestall any kind of crime, all of the people have different and opposing poin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , rewards
...se the level of crime rates with bonuses,rewards or prizes. The very peoples acknowledge...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 920, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... such as UNO or UNESCO, could help with some of the problems. To conclude, I strongly fe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ould be taken with regard to crime rates , even if they are not that high in all o...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tes , even if they are not that high in all of the countries, considering peoples attempt ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, while, as to, kind of, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 483.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93788819876 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74781504124 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505175983437 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.9552062023 49.4020404114 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.526315789 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4210526316 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37454682985 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113232226886 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998190073051 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263255203172 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526435554493 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...humans can forestall any kind of crime, all of the people have different and opposing poin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , rewards
...se the level of crime rates with bonuses,rewards or prizes. The very peoples acknowledge...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 920, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... such as UNO or UNESCO, could help with some of the problems. To conclude, I strongly fe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ould be taken with regard to crime rates , even if they are not that high in all o...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tes , even if they are not that high in all of the countries, considering peoples attempt ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, while, as to, kind of, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 483.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93788819876 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74781504124 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505175983437 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.9552062023 49.4020404114 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.526315789 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4210526316 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37454682985 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113232226886 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998190073051 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263255203172 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526435554493 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.