Many people believe that companies and individuals should pay to clean up the environment in proportion to the amount of pollution they have produced. Do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion and examples.

Pollution have became the most problematic issue that draws attention from worldwide. Who should bear the responsibility for resolving the stinking sewage and the ubiquitous plastic bags still under discussion. Personally, individual and commercial organization ,surly, are encouraged to provide financial support, yet funds and scrutiny from government are also expected.

Money collected from citizens and industry could significantly help mitigation the current situation. By forcing every citizens dwellers instill sewage cleaning equipment and pay for it, on the one hand, guaranteeing a stable source of funds for water treatment, on the other hand, elevating the overall awareness of environment protection, as the bill for water-cleaning serves a great reminder whenever they turn on the tap. Besides, the disposal expenditure added on each product, be it a canned jam, or a box of milk, saved the bother for calculating the total recycling fee every household dues every year, while covers the expenses for recycle it.

It is noteworthy that there are lots of pollution, however, far beyond the ability of a wealthy man or a high profitable organization, and require the authority introduce new policy and allocate money as well as labor to deal with. The oil exploiting industry is a good example to illustrate. Because of it, the greenhouse emission is soaring to a new level that never happened before, the tax added on it is just a fraction compare with the possible fee to counterfeit the negative effect it brings to human being. The only method to alleviate the current situation is enacting policy in favour of curtailing the usage of fossil oil and encouraging popularizing of the sustainable and clean alternatives at the same time.

In general, in an attempt to fight contamination, the consensus effort from both leadership level and execution level are needed, merely through the effort of one part often gains limited success.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
Pollution have became the most problematic issue that draws a...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., individual and commercial organization ,surly, are encouraged to provide financi...
^^
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tiny from government are also expected. Money collected from citizens and indust...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, still, well, while, in general, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33980582524 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99568714191 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650485436893 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5507758633 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0909090909 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0628620485487 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0202815724441 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272624174865 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0319565685419 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272351398231 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.