Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What
are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes.
It is thought that global tourism has an adverse impact on the development of the country. There are numerous factors are contributing to this mainstream; however, these problems could be mitigated by national governments and local residents.
Admittedly, the astonishing number of travelers has led to some detrimental effects on the environment, leading to various widespread diseases, which are considered the main reasons for the bad reputation of international tourism. First, it is undeniable that overseas tourists have been doing harm not only to the natural surroundings but also to wild animals. For instance, a myriad of visitors have thrown their rubbish on the beach or forests breeding the air, water and soil have been contaminated as well as the local animals such as fish-eating this waste which can impact their health and even be fatal. Moreover, by allowing many visitors to pay a visit to each country without careful checking, a plethora of diseases can be spread easily. Take the Covid-19 pandemic as an example, this disease gave given a death toll in Vietnam because of an infected foreign traveler.
However, governments and each individual can tackle this adversity. To begin with, national authorities might give some strict laws and huge fines to those who have to do harm to the surroundings. To be more specific, they can publish these laws on billboards or leaflets to enhance visitors’ awareness, facilitating tourists will pay attention to protecting the environment. Besides, local inhabitants can remind and encourage visitors to put waste in the right places. Additionally, another remedy is that there should be medical checks at airports and borders. This is to guarantee that infected visitors should be quarantined to halt the spread of the disease.
To conclude, although oversea tourism has bred some detrimental effects on the environment as well as human health, this situation could be handled by governments and residents to make this industry becomes more beneficial.
- The graph below shows the number of passengers using three railway networks from 1950 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The following table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities Therefore some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3605015674 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95685905939 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598746081505 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2092956533 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0837027041913 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0256860287077 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435446007212 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.04587996213 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050539848028 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.