Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree?

Social networking sites, for instance Facebook, are thought by some to have had a detrimental impact on our communities and individual as well as our society. However I believe that such site had their own negative effect and positive effect on individual and society, in my opinion, I agree that they are mainly had a damaging effect on local communities.
First of all, for some people who had an opposite view point, social networking sites may be very useful for us nowadays and there are a main factors of development in a lot of countries. But on the other hand, we are now overusing and more depending on social network and this situation keeps us far away from a face-to-face conversation as well as lack of creativeness.
On top of that, we are more and more depend on social network and spent too much of time on internet. Facebook for example, rather than individual people taking part in their local community, they are instead choosing to take interest in people online. Consequently, people in local communities are no longer forming close or supportive relationships. Furthermore, societies as a whole are becoming increasingly more disjointed and fragmented if people spend more time on online chat and never meet face to face and who they are unlikely to ever meet in the future.
In conclusion, social networking sites had more detrimental impact on individual and our community if we mainly depend on online sites day after day and being isolated from our local community. We should change this situation in order to promote a better future of community life.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and individual as well as our society. However I believe that such site had their own ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93258426966 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86099179052 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546816479401 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9481512694 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.7 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 19.2 7.06120827912 272% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25890717631 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981405152626 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775902979869 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163671578687 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924045483859 0.056905535591 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.