It is true that foreign films are more popular than domestically produced films. There are several reasons why this phenomenon has occurred.
In my opinion we need three important elements to make a good film. These factors include creativity, talent, and budget. Foreign film producers and directors are willing to take the risk when it comes to creating new, whereas local film makers are still creating the same type of content. When it comes to creativity local productions are not even close to overseas’. In foreign film industries especial western, there are many talented actors and actress that play in high quality. Despite many talented people of all ages, local film directors use repetitive individuals who have only good face. I think, Iranian writers and producers have a book like a cookbook and they are just repeating the recipes again and again.
To accomplish great things, we must not only have talent but also Money that, playing main role to each industry. Budgets of local films can not compare with huge budget foreign films. They invest a lot of money to create fantastic movies difference from previously products. We do not have this opportunity. In my view, government should give financial support for this field. Based on data, South Korea could make a lot of money from sell entertainments. Governments can raise GDP (one of the economy variable) by investing in this industry and income from sales. They can identify talented people and give them scholarship to study overseas, specially the US being pioneer in this filed.
In conclusion, I believe that financial aid can promote local films that can compete with others even Hollywood that dominate of this industry.
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
- The graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland between 1960 and 1995. 56
- incidence of X disease in Someland 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 11
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...till creating the same type of content. When it comes to creativity local production...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, whereas, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58823624052 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4699515136 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7222222222 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397181104164 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106984328139 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090144177601 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227700414002 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423251775878 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.