Nowadays, modern technology has grown up so fast and that changed the way people communicate with others. It is argued that although the digital communication helps everyone connect easily, but it has caused some effection on social relationships. In my opinion, I approve this argument.
Firstly, because of the convenience of social media, some people had thought it is not necessary to have reality conversation, discourage the real interaction. There will be the ones ready to glue to the screen all day and they deceive yourself that is also considered as face to face. Moreover, go online is meant you can talk with people all around the world. Because of that reason, it created many forming virtual relationships and even some scams. Technology devices and application are created in connection, but if we do not use it in the right way, it wiil be the thing suffer you from social isolation. According to studies high internet use can lead to conflict between parents and children.
In conclusion. I have to say whether useful devices good or bad, depend on how you use it. So let's use it wisely.
- You have seen an advertisement for a weekend job as a local tour guide showing visitors around your city Write a letter of application to the tourism office In the letter Give your reasons for wanting the job Explain why you think you can do the job Descr 73
- How do movies and television influence people s behavior Give reasons and examples to support your answer
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree and disagree 56
- How do movies and television influence people s behavior Give reasons and examples to support your answer 100
- Television entertains but can it also educate
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...od or bad, depend on how you use it. So lets use it wisely.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, even so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 1615.20841683 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 188.0 315.596192385 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90425531915 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80096504096 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.675531914894 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 506.74238477 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3251166577 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8181818182 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278229518491 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744082031521 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681837870779 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157209775241 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720694743975 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.