Changing dramatically in the way of living has particular impacts on the family relationship in many regions. Despite some obvious advantages of this trend, I would argue that these are outweighed by its disadvantages, and in this essay, I will support my opinion with evidence and examples.
On the one hand, the development in human lifestyle has some major benefits for the family association. Firstly, the connection between members becomes more easily because of technology progress regardless of their geographic position. For example, students studying overseas could be not difficult to share or transfer photos about anywhere they travel via social networks with their family. As a result, parents could follow their children’s status with only a smartphone being able to access the internet. Secondly, modern society brings opportunities for travelling for households. By doing this, family members would have more time together to escape temporarily from a busy life.
On the other hand, I believe that its drawbacks are more considerable than such advantages. One reason for this view is that people would be depended much more on technology, which leads to reduce the interaction. Youngers usually tend to search for information and helps on the internet rather than from parents and grandparents. This causes a lack of family conversations. Another reason is due to pressures of work in modern society, there would be no time for parents to spend on family. Parents often have to finish daily work mass very late so that they lack time to have dinner with family or talk together. This is also a contributing factor to the increasing divorce rate.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the drawbacks of depending much more on technology and lack of time for family outweigh its benefits, and I suppose this is a negative trend.
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 78
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 84
- the advantages and disadvantages of the learning English in Vietnam 82
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002, and projections for 2050. 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20735785953 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89752189957 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5595890724 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3125 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192225855989 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656167792242 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628116352202 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129315792335 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468745585142 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.