Thanks to today’s technological advances, supporting a work from home policy is increasingly accessible. It not only lets employers skip on the costs associated with an office, but it also provides freedom and work flexibility. Working from home is filled with both joys and woes. In this essay, I am going to weigh these out, and see if the pros exceed the cons.
When you work from home, the time returned on normal tasks is reduced significantly. Rather than packing your car, a bag, and navigating traffic, all of that is eliminated. Moreover, any need to get properly “ready” for the workplace pretty much goes out the window. Furthermore, because you eliminate this preparation time, employees can start their day earlier and enter their focus zone without all of the steps of physically getting to your office. Secondly, Productivity gains are massive. Office chats, desk discussions and noisy team lunches can be seriously distracting, particularly if you’re currently working in an open floor plan. A quick walk to the company kitchen could turn into a 15-minute chat that you weren’t planning on, and slow down your workflow. Thirdly, if you don’t have to shell out the cash for expensive office space every month, think about all the other things you could do for your company (or your profit margins). Lastly, on top of saving financially, you also reduce consumption, trash production, gas spent getting to and from the office and thus help mother earth.
As wonderful as it is to work from the comfort of your home, distractions come in different forms. At home, we may have our laundry, an unfinished art project and household chores to do. Secondly, Some people end up getting less done without the direct supervision of managers. Without the motivations inherent in an office setting, productivity can just as easily decrease rather than increase when you institute a work from home policy. Lastly, a work-from-home policy will institute less face-to-face time between various teams and individual employees on the same team required for team-work.
To conclude, I would suggest that the upsides of working from home surely exceed the drawbacks of this policy. Not only is it good for the productivity of the employees but also good on the environment. As it saves on valuable resources like electricity and helps to reduce our carbon footprint.
- More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or remotely rather than going into an office each day Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Children who start reading reading earlier in life perform better later on in their school studies How important are the early reading skills in a child s academic performance What other pre school factors influence a child s later academic achievements 67
- More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or remotely rather than going into an office each day Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many universities graduates cannot find a job in their chosen profession what factors may have caused this situation and what in your opinion should be care about it 79
- Some people think that when a person travels into a different culture they should adapt to the local practices and customs To what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...operly “ready” for the workplace pretty much goes out the window. Furthermore, becau...
^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...lier and enter their focus zone without all of the steps of physically getting to your off...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10769230769 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82919409912 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2240085539 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8571428571 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264032422515 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727255055325 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492301300488 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157631892361 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412707344548 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.