More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can govt make urban life better for everyone?
Migration of people into cities in search of better quality of life is increasing, though city life has lots of drawbacks. Water scarcity and traffic congestion are the two main problems of urban life; However, government can improve the infrastructure of metro water facilities and public transportation to curb these issues.
The foremost disadvantage of ever increasing city population is the lack of water to meet the demand. As people move and settle in cities in search of jobs and other purposes, the city’s existing water resource exhausts sooner than earlier and leave the residents in trouble. Not only will this be a burden for the city people but also for the government, on whom the responsibility falls. If government were to build new water reservoirs in cities in direct proportion to the incoming migrants, demand for water may be met considerably.
The second most issue of denser city life is the heavy traffic congestion. Since the reason for migration to cities is to search for jobs to have a better life, more vehicles than usual are on roads as more people commute to work every day. The public transport system that is improvised and modernised to hold and to attract more number of passengers will reduce the number of private vehicles on roads. This was evident when every single stop of Tokyo was connected by metro train, people stopped using their own vehicles for transportation and consequently there was lesser number of vehicles on the roads.
To conclude, the population of cities is increasing due to constant inflow of migrants in search of jobs, because of which the city runs out of water resources much earlier and also has congested roads due to increasing number of private vehicles. That is why government needs to consider building new water reservoirs to meet the demand and improving the existing public transportation to discourage the people from using their own vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Garrett | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Garrett | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | MotiurRahman | 78 | view |
- Nowadays families are not as close as they used to be.What do you think are the causes of this?What can be done to make families closer? 67
- International sporting events are costly and bring problems to the hosting country To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your position 73
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 73
- Nowadays more and more children are appearing in reality shows. Some people feel it is a good trend. others do not agree.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat is improvised and modernised to hold and to attract more number of passengers...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04702194357 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79203192349 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504702194357 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9310847873 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312380522311 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126328075801 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113597735467 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193391702256 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937120728263 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.